Editorial & AI policy

We use AI to do the heavy lifting — researching topics, drafting first versions and translating between English and Spanish. A human editor then reviews, edits, fact-checks and approves every article before it goes live. Nothing is published automatically.

Each piece passes through a pipeline of checks: relevance, verification of claims, an originality rewrite (we don't copy sources), a safety review, translation and SEO. The final gate is always a person.

For tools and guides, our recommendations are grounded in hands-on use, official documentation and primary sources — not vibes. When we compare options, we describe the criteria we used and the trade-offs we found.

When something has not been tested first-hand, we say so. If a claim is uncertain or evolving, we flag it directly in the article instead of pretending to certainty.

Every article is AI-assisted and human-reviewed; this is disclosed on the article itself. The AI does not have the final say — a human editor approves or rejects each draft, and an audit log records who decided what.

We do not publish AI-generated images as if they were real photographs, and we do not fabricate quotes, data or sources.

We link to the primary sources behind each story so you can verify them yourself. We rewrite in our own words and add analysis; we don't republish other outlets' copy.

We may earn affiliate commissions and show advertising to fund the work. This never decides our verdicts: we recommend on merit. Any sponsored or paid placement is clearly labelled as such.

We fix errors openly. If you spot a mistake, email editorial@noti.media and we will correct the article and note significant changes. Accuracy matters more than being first.